Friday, February 5, 2010

What do you think? (Ryan Case)

In the case of Ryan, the story is about Ryan driving his car to Georgetown and talked with his wife without using hands-free. In the consequence, he lost control and hit a walking pedestrian. In my opinion, Ryan should under civil law case. According definition from Wikipedia, there is the branch of law dealing with disputes between individuals or organizations, in which compensation may be awarded to the victim. He will be on civil court and Ryan as a defendant, he may be found liable or not liable. In my view point, the pedestrian loss is depend how actually damage.

By the way, In the case of Geena, she runs an unregistered online investment portal from her home in KL where she managed to get people deposit money to her account. Yet, it was discovered that the investment was a scam and she try to flee with the money, only to arrested in the airport by immigration officers because she held a fake passport. In my opinion, it is liable criminal law. Criminal law is distinctive for the uniquely serious potential consequences or for failure to abide by its rules.

No comments:

Post a Comment